Home > 2012 Election Series, Atlanta, Bishop Charles Blake, Bishop John Sheard, Bishop Larry Shaw, Bishop Thomas Holsley, COGIC, Delaware Jurisdiction, lawsuit, legal documents, letters > Breaking: Atlanta law firm to file federal racketeering lawsuit against COGIC Presiding Bishop; Board of Bishops Chairman

Breaking: Atlanta law firm to file federal racketeering lawsuit against COGIC Presiding Bishop; Board of Bishops Chairman

cogicbishops-hosleyAtlanta – Charges of leadership abuses by the administration of Bishop Charles Blake, Sr may have crested with a new volley of potential legal charges. Today Report COGIC Abuse confirmed an Atlanta law firm has sent a letter to the  Church of God in Christ (COGIC) Presiding Bishop and its Chairman of the Board of Bishops informing them of the intent to file a federal lawsuit alleging racketeering, theft by extortion and several other charges.

Report COGIC Abuse obtained an original copy of the letter sent to Bishop Charles Blake, Sr of Los Angeles and Bishop John Sheard of Detroit dated August 27 by attorneys from the law firm of Changus Campbell LLP on behalf of its clients Bishop Larry Shaw of Savannah, GA and Bishop Thomas Holsey of Dover, DE.

Also named as a potential defendant in the lawsuit is the Church of God in Christ, Inc.

Blake and Sheard are accused of violating  O.C.G.A. [Official Code of Georgia Annotated] § 16-14-9 (RICO) . § 16-18-16 (theft by extortion) and  and § 16-14-3 (9)(B) (theft chargeable under the laws of the United States).  The two are alleged to have engaged in a “pattern of racketeering activity…conspiring together or with others to violate O.C.G.A. § 16-14-4.”

Perhaps the most serious charge is that the Presiding Bishop violated IRS laws by failing to “properly report, identify and pay taxes on revenues generated from offerings within the church”, thus jeopardizing the denomination’s tax exempt status.

The letter cites evidence yet to be revealed accusing Bishop Sheard of offering controversial Atlanta media personality William McCray III (ordained COGIC elder; red glasses) “thousands of dollars” to post defamatory information on his website called Obnoxious Blog.  See those reports here and here.  McCray has claimed that the Sheards are personal friends.  Warning: profanity and graphic descriptions of sexual activity on this site.

The letter also contends that Sheard instructed McCray to post the false and defamatory information prior to 2012 COGIC elections in an attempt to destroy Shaw’s re-election efforts. Bishop Shaw is currently secretary of the denomination’s Board of Bishops. Sheard and Shaw have been in a long standing dispute over Sheard’s unjust persecution of fellow Bishop Thomas Holsey.  See our previous coverage here.

It appears this entire situation was supposed to have remained private between the accused parties and the law firm until a September 13 deadline had expired. But sources tell Report COGIC Abuse, Sheard immediately forwarded the letter via email two days later without comment to about 20 select bishops. Its unclear if he consulted with the Presiding Bishop before doing so or had his approval.

We’ve posted a copy of the letter in our letters and documents section. RCA will continue to update this story as pertinent information becomes available.

Advertisements
  1. warrenma
    August 30, 2013 at 3:32 pm

    “Perhaps the most serious charge is that the Presiding Bishop violated IRS laws by failing to “properly report, identify and pay taxes on revenues generated from offerings within the church”, thus jeopardizing the denomination’s tax exempt status.”

    This is a very serious charge. May be hard to prove. Churches are not required to report, identify or pay taxes on revenues generated from offerings (one of its main tax-exempt purposes). They would need to prove that such revenue that was collected was not used for the Church’s tax-exempt purpose to make a case for violation of IRS laws. They would need to have documented credible evidence that this money was used in some other way that violated these purposes. That is a tall order to fill.

    • August 30, 2013 at 4:10 pm

      Indeed, but I dont think that this law firm would issue frivolous words without some substantial basis behind them. We shall see.

  1. August 30, 2013 at 2:23 pm

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: